I fail to see how Donald Trump having a sexual relationship with a porn actress is news. That’s the way CNN is treating it, as though it’s news. We have the cheap plan with Dish so CNN is the only cable news channel we have. The other cable news channels may be ignoring the story, but I wouldn’t know.
It’s embarrassing. I was sitting in the waiting room at my gastroenterologist’s office and CNN was on the TV. The main topic of discussion was porn actress Stormy Daniels and whether he non-disclosure contract with Donald Trump was valid or not because he didn’t sign it.
I don’t care.
We’ve known for a while that Donald Trump was not a good person. He heard him in his own words talk about grabbing women “by the pussy” and getting away with it because he was famous. And this was before the 2016 presidential election. People still voted for him.
Donald Trump is not a good man and he didn’t hide this fact from the voters.
Under normal conditions, the President of the United States having a sexual relationship with a porn actress and a non-disclosure with a porn actress would be a big story if we had a normal human being as president. We don’t have a normal human being for president. We have Donald Trump.
I’m old enough to remember the fear he and his “family” caused the public. Charles Manson was clearly insane, yet he was condemned to rot in prison, not a mental institution for the rest of his natural life. He also wasn’t sent to the gas chamber, something you would think would be a no-brainer considering the death and terror he left in his wake. He was originally condemned to death, but when California invalidated the death penalty in 1972, his punishment was automatically commuted to life in prison. Then in 1978, California reinstituted the death penalty, but since Manson’s sentence was commuted to life, there was no backsies.
And yes, that was the legal term for it.
I’m glad Manson is dead. It’s one more thing to be thankful for this Thanksgiving.
My favorite part about waking up this morning and finding out Charles Manson was dead was how CNN framed the story. On their website, they have a photo of Manson, followed by that awful and obnoxious Ball basketball family from California, followed by a photo of Sean Hannity looking incredibly constipated.
Of everyone shown, Hannity looks the most miserable.
The New York Post published an interesting cover.
Make room Satan, Charles Manson is finally going to Hell? Manson never personally killed anyone. His followers were the ones who did the actual killing. Manson wasn’t even present for the murder of actress Sharon Tate, undoubtedly the most infamous of the Manson Family victims.
I’d wager there were far worse people in Hell than Charles Manson if Hell actually existed.
CNN is reporting that Netflix cut ties with Kevin Spacey, Oscar award-winning actor and sexual predator of teenage boys. Just because CNN says something, doesn’t mean it’s true.
For example, I went to my Netflix account and did a search for Kevin Spacey. Lots of results appeared. Here are the top three results:
If Netflix truly cut ties with Kevin Spacey, it would mean they were not making money from his work or paying him for his work. Having his movies and TV shows in their library provides content for Netflix subscribers. People pay to subscribe to Netflix.
Netflix still has economic ties with Kevin Spacey
If I decide to watch House of Cards on Netflix, Kevin Spacey makes money. Netflix pays him a residual for viewership of his work. Not only as an actor but as a producer as well.
If you’re still writing checks to someone, you can’t claim you’ve “cut ties” with them.
Why is CNN claiming Netflix cut ties with Kevin Spacey when a 10-second search on Netflix proves it’s not true? Because they’re lazy and they don’t seem to have a problem with reporting things that are not true. CNN probably received a press release from Netflix that said they cut ties with Kevin Spacey and the reporter assigned to the story, Sandra Gonzalez, treated it as gospel.
At best it’s lazy reporting on the part of Sandra Gonzalez and a lack of editorial overwatch. At worst, it’s fake news, a willful misreporting of the facts. Knowing CNN, it’s probably a little bit of both.
The announcement sets Republicans up to change Senate rules — referred to as the “nuclear option” — to lowering the threshold of advancing Supreme Court nominees to just 51 votes from 60.
This annoys me. Changing the number equaling a majority in the U.S. Senate from 60 to 51 is not a nuclear anything: it’s basic math. A country with as many nuclear weapons as we have should never throw the term “nuclear” around unless it’s actually referring to something nuclear. We’ve used nuclear weapons before. Twice. We’re the only country in the world that can make that claim.
With that said, we should stop being so flippant with the word nuclear. We should only use that word when it actually applies to weaponizing the energy released from nuclear reactions.
A bunch of mostly rich, old men changing the way they vote on something is not nuclear, it’s just plain old democracy. At least our retarded version of it.