Bent Corner

One might think that after the recent Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike and the blow back it caused to the TV industry, it would be a very long time before anyone in Hollywood wanted to go on strike again. It would seem that thought would be wrong.

The Screen Actor’s Guild (SAG) is planning on seeking authorization from it’s members to go on strike. From Vanity:

SAG hasn’t yet disclosed exactly when it will send out the authorization, which will require a 75% approval from those voting to go on strike. The guild will need at least three weeks to conduct the vote, so it’s still unclear whether SAG could be on strike in time to disrupt the Jan. 11 Golden Globes.

SAG members have been without a contract for months now. Why doesn’t SAG just agree to the same deal that the other six (6) Hollywood labor unions got? I thought that was why so many actors supported the WGA during their strike. They knew that they as SAG members would be getting the same deal as the WGA got.

Evidently they want more.

SAG president Alan Rosenberg insists that SAG members are different. From The Hollywood Reporter:

“Management continues to apply its one-size-fits-all demands to SAG actors,” he said. “And we continue to stress that actors have unique, reasonable needs that are different, not better, but different than writers, directors and crewmembers.”

The SAG should just take the same terms that the other unions got and be done with it.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

The rank and file members of the Writers Guild of America still have to vote, but it appears the 14 week writers strike is almost over. From the Washington Post article:

The most immediate beneficiaries of a settlement could be the thousands of production workers — grips, caterers, camera operators, makeup artists — who were thrown out of work when the writers struck. Although movie production mostly continued during the strike, TV shows on both coasts quickly came to a halt when the strike began Nov. 5.

This has been precisely my contention from the very beginning; This strike was highly damaging to a vast amount of people that work behind the scenes on TV shows. People that never stood to gain a single penny from Internet residuals.

Also from the Washington Post article:

On the key issue of compensation for work streamed over the Internet, both sides gave a little. The studios and their network allies originally asked the guild for time to study the issue and declined to offer any residuals for digital media when talks broke off in early December. The guild, in turn, held fast, arguing that writers had to share in the profits of what may become the preeminent way to view filmed entertainment.

But the writers never wanted to share in the profits. The writers have always insisted that they be paid whether their work generates a profit or not. Their cut has always come from the gross, not the net.

I’ve been trying to learn more about the Writers Guild of America (WGA) writers strike. Much of what I’ve read or heard about the reasons for the strike seem to be contradict other things I’ve read or heard about the strike. I found a list of points at the WGA.org website. Here’s a quick summery of the main sticking points:

• Home Video (Videocassettes and DVDs) Residuals - They currently get 0.3% of the distributors’ gross for the first $1 million and 0.36% thereafter. They want 0.6% of the distributors’ gross for the first $1 million and 0.72% thereafter.

• Non-Traditional Media Residuals - They currently get .3% of the gross for downloads where the customer pays for the download. They currently get paid nothing when the customer pays nothing. They want a residual payment of 2.5% of the distributor’s gross for re-use on non-traditional media, including the Internet. I’m not sure what they want to be paid when the content is free. It’s hard to assign a percentage to free.

If you go back and watch the YouTube video I posted the other day from the people from The Office, what they say in the video seems to contradict the information found on the WGA website. B.J. Novak, actor and writer for The Office, says that every time he meets a new viewer to The Office, they are watching it on the Internet or on DVD. I’m assuming that when they say they were watching it on the Internet, they were downloading the episodes from iTunes. Only recently did NBC start streaming episodes from free. The inference is that Novak and the other writers aren’t getting paid for the episodes on the Internet or on DVD.

That’s not true. If money changes hands, the writers are getting a percentage.

Talks between the Writers Guild of America and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers ended with the two sides not being able to agree to a new contract, resulting in television and movie writers going on strike. The conflict seems to be over on how to divvy up money generated from DVD sales and the Internet.

Much of the disagreement seems to be over how earnings will be generated in the future using technology or mediums that may not even exist today.

Jay Leno and David Letterman will be in reruns until the strike comes to an end. Evidently they both need their zany wisecracks written out for them before hand. The same applies to The Daily Show and the Colbert Report. No new episodes until the strike is over.

I’ll be perfectly honest and admit that I don’t understand the concept of residuals and perpetual earnings. I’m a simple electronics technician. I repair frequency drives used to power three-phase AC electrical motors. I work for the company that makes these drives. When I repair a drive and ship it back to it’s owner, I don’t continue making money from the profits generated from the drive I repaired.

I don’t understand why somebody that wrote something for Jay Leno to say on TV should be paid more then once. I don’t understand why they should continue getting paid for said writing on a continuous basis. Its hard for me to grasp.