My blog posts are dishonest?
I had a few people leave comments on yesterday’s post about World Soccer Daily going off the air that I felt the need to delete. To say that deleting comments here is a rare occurrence is a huge understatement.
I don’t employ comment moderation and I generally allow people to say what they want in the comment section, as long as they are the ones actually saying it. What I don’t appreciate is when someone simply pastes the words of someone else from another blog or website into my comment section.
I usually delete these comments as spam.
This morning I received an email from one of the people who left comments yesterday that I had to delete. In his message to me, he encouraged me to post his email. I’ve decided to do that as well as reply to it.
Horace Steenblatter wrote:
From: Horace Steenblatter (hsteenblatter@yahoo.co.uk)
To: rick@bentcorner.com
Date: Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:19 AM
Subject: Your blog posts are dishonestYou are not deleting “something negative someone on another blog wrote concerning Steven Cohen.” You have repeatedly deleted comments that I’ve left under my own name which consisted of nothing but Cohen’s own words and Chelsea FC’s response to Cohen’s words. If you were actually concerned with disseminating factual information, you would let Cohen’s words speak for themselves rather than posting dishonest information which only contain a partial account of his words. How in the world is a post about Steven Cohen’s words “not the place” for Steven Cohen’s words?
Horace, your comments were not the only ones I felt the need to delete yesterday. Not that what you were actually leaving comments. You were simply pasting statements from other blogs and websites dedicated to getting Steven Cohen “fired” from his own radio show because he shared an opinion.
That’s what radio talk show hosts do in this country. They share opinions. Nobody says that you have to agree with it. Nobody says that you have to listen to it. Nobody says you have to like it.
I’ve posted the actual quote that got Steven Cohen in trouble with Liverpool supporters. You or anyone else re-posting it in the comment section is at best, unnecessarily redundant. It’s also not even important. Cohen only voiced his opinion about an historical event. People shouldn’t be shut down or threatened with physical harm because of their opinion.
At least not in the United States of America.
Furthermore, the comment section of my blog is not for you or anyone else to treat as their own personal blog. If you want to re-post content from other blogs or other websites, get your own blog and do it there.
Do not do it here.
A whole 38 days later, Liverpool FC condemns comments made on a popular radio talk show

From the official Liverpool Football Club website:
Liverpool Football Club totally condemns the comments regarding the Hillsborough disaster made by the radio and TV broadcaster Steve Cohen.
“Mr Cohen has obviously never taken the time to read the Taylor Report which stated clearly that ticketless fans were not a contributory factor or responsible for the events of that day.
“To use the 20th anniversary of the disaster to repeat false claims about Liverpool fans (which Mr Cohen first broadcast and then apologised [sic] for in 2006) is even more unacceptable.
The statement is really quite remarkable. Not because of the amount of time it took the team to issue a response, but because of the fact that the Liverpool FC organization chose not to address the death threats and other assorted comments made against Steven Cohen by Liverpool FC supporters.
That’s really quite unfortunate. The organization, in my opinion, missed a golden opportunity to help ratchet down the over-the-top, visceral behavior coming from some of their supporters. If anything, this statement from the team 38 days after the fact will only help fan the flames.
They should have denounced the death threats.
Steven Cohen apologizes

At the beginning of the second hour of today’s Word Soccer Daily, co-host Steven Cohen read an apology for this recent comments concerning the 1989 Hillsborough disaster. He also posted the apology on the Word Soccer Daily website.
It reads:
First of all I would like to apologize for comments made on World Soccer Daily on Monday April 13th that referred back to an event from April 1989. My apology is directed at any and all people whose feelings have been hurt and people who have had awful memories and scars re-opened. The apology is heartfelt, genuine and sincere.
There are some I suspect who will look at this apology with a cynical eye and of course you are entitled to see it as you like.
We are all football fans, we are all passionate football fans and the events that I am referring to could have happened to any club, in any sport, in any country at any public gathering. This is proved by events in the Ivory Coast recently as well as in South America, Ghana, the old Soviet Union etc …
Let me continue by saying that I came to this country 27 years ago, I believe in this country and what it stands for and most importantly I believe in the freedom of speech, opinion and expression and hold these values and freedoms as being amongst the most treasured of all freedoms. I wore the uniform of the US Army for 4 years between 1982 and 1986 because these freedoms are worth defending and worth fighting for. While there are many people in this world who’s views make my blood boil I would fight to defend their right to say what they believe.
I recognize that with my position as one of the hosts of a popular radio show I have a responsibility to my audience and perhaps the radio is not the ideal place to express every opinion and every belief I have if the net result is many people being hurt and upset.
By the same token those who use a keyboard and computer to exercise their own freedom of speech, opinion and expression also have a responsibility. They have a responsibility not to sensationalize comments made and twist them for their maximum appeal especially when this is done only for their own commercial benefit and clearly with malice intended.
Finally, to those out there in the United States who have hidden behind computers and monitors to send correspondence including too many death threats to count know that your actions and words hurt this game in this country more than help it. This game has yet to find a solid and guaranteed footing in the American sporting landscape and the baggage that this game carries with it from the past is only re-enforced and emphasized by threats of violence and death.
Lastly the subjects being addressed in this statement will never be discussed on this show again unless it is in a open forum or debate where both sides view points can be addressed and considered.
I for one hope this puts an end to this whole “controversy”.
Defending Steven Cohen
Steven Cohen, co-host of World Soccer Daily, a satellite radio show dedicated to all things soccer, is in a bit of hot water over some things he said on a recent show. On an April 13 episode, while taking phone calls from listeners, Cohen commented on the 1989 Hillsborough Disaster.
It was a horrific event where 96 soccer fans were crushed to death at an FC Cup semi-final match between between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest.
So what exactly did Cohen say? From EPL Talk:
“People showing up without ticket, hell bent in getting into somewhere where they shouldn’t be going because they don’t have tickets, is the root cause of [the Hillsborough Disaster].”
Except this is not what Cohen actually said. The quote is incorrect. The above is a partial quote about the 23 fans that died in a similar fashion in the Ivory Coast at a World Cup qualifier. The correct quote should read:
“The thing is, the 23 that died in the Ivory Coast, in my opinion, the police were absolutely had something to do with it. At the end of the day, people showing up without ticket, hell bent in getting into somewhere where they shouldn’t be going because they don’t have tickets, is the root cause of it in my opinion.
Cohen went on to say more. Also from EPL Talk:
“I’m yet to read anybody write in this weekend’s Sunday papers in England, where they’re all doing big commemorations about the 96, and why we should never forget and how it’s changed the game, nobody discusses the 6,000 to 8,000 who showed up without tickets and my argument has always been, if those people don’t show up, this never happens.”
This too is not an accurate quote, but in this case, the misquoting does not change what Cohen said. His point is that Liverpool fans showed up at the game without tickets. The episode can be downloaded from iTunes. The comments on Hillsborough begin around the 1 hour, 13 minute mark.
People who have a problem with what Cohen said seem bothered the most by Cohen’s opinion that “6,000 to 8,000″ Liverpool fans showed up at the game without tickets. The Taylor Report, the official inquiry into the Hillsborough Disaster, found this not to be the case.
What bothers me the most about all this is that a group identifying themselves as the The North American Liverpool Supporters are trying to get those that advertise on World Soccer Daily to drop the show. They sending form letters to advertisers, urging advertisers to drop the show. An excerpt:
This is not a free speech issue. Mr. Cohen has every right to say what he wants on air within FCC regulations. However he has crossed the line as far as we are concerned. So he is free to say whatever he wants but with free speech one also needs to understand there are consequences to ones action. The potential boycott is one of those consequences.
Except it is a free speech issue and there are no FCC regulations concerning satellite talk radio. Cohen stated over and over again that he was only stating his opinion of what happened that tragic day in Hillsborough. The anonymous members of The North American Liverpool Supporters are the ones that have crossed the line by contacting sponsors to get them to stop advertising on World Soccer Daily.
It’s a dick move.
Is Cohen wrong about the 6,000 to 8,000 ticketless Liverpool fans? Probably, but that shouldn’t matter. Cohen is a radio talk show host. His job is to say things. Sometimes those things are going to be wrong. Sometimes those things are going to be controversial. Sometimes those things are going to be stupid. If you don’t like what someone on the radio is saying, don’t listen. Just because you don’t like what someone says on the radio doesn’t mean you have a right to get someone permanently silenced. It’s wrong.



