Money for ballparks for millionaires, but none for bringing terrorists to justice?

Remember when the Obama administration decided accused September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would face trial in a federal courtroom in New York City, close to where the World Trade Center once stood? It appears billionaire New York City Mayor- for-Life Michael Bloomberg has gotten his way. NBC News is reporting that the administration has decided not to try Mohammed in the city.
Bloomberg has been whining lately about money the added security would cost the city, reportedly an extra $216 million. If I was the billionaire mayor of New York City, I’d pay for the added security out of my own pocket. No price would be too high for the privilege of bringing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to my city so that he could get some payback for what he did.
What’s $216 million to a billionaire? Keep in mind that New York City paid $370.9 million to build the new Yankee Stadium. They also shelled out $138 million for the new Mets’ Citi Field. It’s good to know that they evidently have money to build ballparks for millionaires, but not for bringing to justice someone that helped kill 2,605 New Yorkers.
Evidently some New Yorkers are frightened of the idea of trying terror suspects in New York City. That somehow it will make New York City a much bigger target to Islamic terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda. As if the city of New York isn’t already a huge target for terror.
I don’t understand the thinking behind this. If one of my loved ones was killed by a terrorist or any other criminal, I would make it my life’s work in making sure whoever killed them paid for what they did.
I would not care what it cost.
Obama administration working to allow ‘troubled borrowers’ stay in homes they cannot afford

The Obama administration is trying to help people who cannot afford to pay their mortgage payment to stay in their home. Great!
From The Huffington Post
Under the $75 billion Treasury program, companies that agree to lower payments for troubled borrowers collect $1,000 initially from the government for each loan, followed by $1,000 annually for up to three years.
The government support, which is provided from the $700 billion financial bailout program, is aimed at providing cash incentives for mortgage providers to accept smaller mortgage payments rather than foreclosing on homes.
So in other words, the federal government will reward mortgage providers that provided home loans to people that could not afford those loans. Why even make prospective borrowers fill out all that paper work?
Also from the same article:
Rising foreclosures depress home prices and threaten the sustainability of the fledgling economic recovery.
The problem is, home prices are still too high. Until we return to a time when a family making the national median average in wages can afford the national median average priced home, people will continue to over-borrow to buy a home. Prices for homes have skyrocketed while wages have remained nearly stagnant. Compounding the problem is that productivity has increased, resulting in less need for employees. A less need for employees not only keeps unemployment rates high, it helps keep wages stagnant.
I think it’s great that the federal government wants to help people. I just don’t think helping people stay in homes they cannot afford is really helping them. Rewarding borrowers $1,000 a year for three years for loaning money to people they should not have loaned money to is rewarding wrong doing. And it’s not like the federal government has more money than it knows what to do with. How many of these people who now cannot afford their mortgage payments refinanced during the housing bubble into loans with adjustable rates based on home values that existed only on paper?
What’s next, will the Obama administration go to Vegas and help people that lost all their money at the crap tables?



