Tag: Mary Jane

What does Joe Quesada have against marriage?

I don’t normally read Spider-Man comics. That doesn’t mean I don’t recognize the character as one of the most popular characters that Marvel Comics has. He’s a very popular character. Just not with me.

I was surprised to read on the Interents that Marvel Comics is going to do a major change to the character. Spider-Man, aka Peter Parker is married to his high school sweet heart Mary Jane. Marvel’s Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada has never liked the fact that Peter Parker was married. He supposedly thinks it makes the character non-relatable to the younger readers.

Marvel Comics has younger readers? And to think I thought the kids were reading creepy Japanese manga where everyone has the really big eyes.

So Joe Quesada thinks Spider-Man being married makes youthful readers less inclined to relate to him? Never mind the fact that he can shoot web goo from his wrists and that he has superhuman strength and dexterity. It’s the whole “married thing” that confuses the youngsters and makes it so they can’t relate to him.

The most retarded thing about this whole story is how they are going to make him non-married. Instead of just having him divorce Mary Jane, they are going to place him in a situation where his Aunt May is going to die. The Devil (seriously, the Devil) makes a deal with Spider-Man: The Devil will save Aunt May if he agrees that his relationship and his marriage with Mary Jane will have never happened. Aunt May will live, but Peter and Mary Jane will not only not be married, they will have no memories of even knowing each other.

That has got to be the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard of.

Who in their right mind would give up the love of their life just so their enfeebled old aunt can defy nature and go on living? Aunt May has lived a full life. It’s time for her to go join Uncle Ben.

Joe Quesada must really hate being married. If this even sounds slightly plausible to him, his wife is in trouble.

I’m willing to bet the TV in Joe Quesada’s bathroom that this has less to do with appealing to youthful readers and more to do with getting publicity in the mainstream press. I think Quesada is addicted to seeing his name in the USA TODAY.

Chasing the all mighty comic book smut dollar

I don’t understand why Marvel Comics would give the go ahead for something like this.  Is this really how they want one of their main properties to be displayed?  All sexed up?   I was under the impression that they kind of liked Spider-Man and valued the entire Spider-Man property.  If that’s true, why resort to making Spider-Man’s wife a bare foot, thong wearing laundry tub slut?

I’m no prude.  I’m also not one to get offended.  I just think this is stupid and even a little hypocritical.  My favorite monthly Marvel comic Alias was supposedly canceled because writer Brian Michael Bendis was not allowed to use top-line Marvel characters such as Spider-Man.  Alias dealt with stories more of an adult nature in content.

Just because there are statue companies out there that make sexed up weirdo friendly Japanese anime figurines, doesn’t mean Marvel Comics needs to do it too. They should let other companies, companies not called Marvel Comics corner the creepy pervert adult figurine market.

Marvel Comics should be above this.

Ok, I’m back.  After typing the above sentence I broke out in uncontrollable laughter which resulted in me falling down, hitting my head, and blacking out.

I feel much better now.  What was I blogging about?  Oh yes, the pervert Mary Jane statue.  I’ve been reading that people have been letting both Marvel Comics and Sideshow Collectibles (the company that is making the perv statue) know what they think about this statue.  People have been leaving comments on both Marvel Comics and Sideshow Collectibles websites detailing their displeasure with this statue.  Both Marvel Comics and Sideshow Collectibles have been responding by deleting these comments.  They have allowed all the other comments to remains.  The comments left by pervy men wanting to buy this statue.

What’s Marvel Comics trying to do, attract even more weirdos to the medium of comic books?

Ragnell over at Written World blogged about someone leaving a comment on Marvel Comics Editor-In-Chief Joe Quesada’s blog asking him if he’d please write about the approval process for this figurine.  Regnell writes that two hours later, the person’s comment had been deleted.

Talk about dealing with a problem head on.

I think this statue is disrespectful.  Not only to women in general, but to one of their own intellectual properties.  So what will Marvel Comics do next, approve the making of a collectible statue showing Spider-Man putting on a condom?