Bent Corner

Blogging from Williamsport, Maryland so you don't have to.

Tag: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Money for ballparks for millionaires, but none for bringing terrorists to justice?

Remember when the Obama administration decided accused September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would face trial in a federal courtroom in New York City, close to where the World Trade Center once stood?  It appears billionaire New York City Mayor- for-Life Michael Bloomberg has gotten his way.  NBC News is reporting that the administration has decided not to try Mohammed in the city.

Bloomberg has been whining lately about money the added security would cost the city, reportedly an extra $216 million.  If I was the billionaire mayor of New York City, I’d pay for the added security out of my own pocket.  No price would be too high for the privilege of bringing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to my city so that he could get some payback for what he did.

What’s $216 million to a billionaire?  Keep in mind that New York City paid $370.9 million to build the new Yankee Stadium.  They also shelled out $138 million for the new Mets’ Citi Field.  It’s good to know that they evidently have money to build ballparks for millionaires, but not for bringing to justice someone that helped kill 2,605 New Yorkers.

Evidently some New Yorkers are frightened of the idea of trying terror suspects in New York City.  That somehow it will make New York City a much bigger target to Islamic terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda.  As if the city of New York isn’t already a huge target for terror.

I don’t understand the thinking behind this.  If one of my loved ones was killed by a terrorist or any other criminal, I would make it my life’s work in making sure whoever killed them paid for what they did.

I would not care what it cost.

John Shadegg is a fear mongering coward

Arizona Representative Republican John Shadegg stood on the House floor speaking out against trying those that participated in the September 11 terror attacks in a New York civilian courtroom and posed a rhetorical question to New York City mayor for life, billionaire Michael Bloomberg how he’d feel if his daughter was kidnapped by terrorists.

Classy.

Doesn’t Shadegg have a staff that he can run ideas past before he opens his mouth and says something really stupid? What a stupid thing to say. I’m sure Bloomberg would hate to have his daughter kidnapped. Who wouldn’t? That doesn’t mean he should curl up in a ball under his desk.

I don’t understand fear mongers like Shadegg. What does he think, that we shouldn’t try terrorists like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? I assume that he’s in favor of military tribunals. I guess then only members of the military and their families would face possible repercussions from the terrorists.

Does Shadegg not care about military families?

When did it become OK for Americans to act like cowards? It’s a trick question because it’s not OK. When you react to terrorism with fear and trepidation, you are responding just the way they want you to respond.

My advice to John Shadegg is that if he cannot get past his fears, maybe he ought to move to Canada. That’s what cowards did during the Vietnam conflict, they went to Canada.

Sarah Palin will tell you what you can do with your fact checking

Former Alaska governor and vice-presidential hopeful Sarah Palin’s new book is coming out tomorrow. A lot of people, including those that worked in the McCain campaign, have taken exception to some of the contents of the book, specifically the parts she evidently just made up. The AP have been going through the book and have been writing about the factual errors the book contains. Palin has a problem with this. So much so that she wrote about it on her Facebook page:

Amazingly, but not surprisingly, the AP somehow nabbed a copy of the book before it was released. They’re now erroneously reporting on the book’s contents and are repeating many of the same things they spewed during the campaign and afterwards. We’ve heard 11 writers are engaged in this opposition research, er, “fact checking” research! Imagine that – 11 AP reporters dedicating time and resources to tearing up the book, instead of using the time and resources to “fact check” what’s going on with Sheik Mohammed’s trial, Pelosi’s health care takeover costs, Hasan’s associations, etc. Amazing.

She refers to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as though Sheik is his title, like the Iron Sheik. It’s not his title, it’s his middle name. Maybe she just likes to refer to people by their middle name. In that case, I’m going to start referring to her has Louise Palin. That’s her middle name.

Louise Palin also wrote the following:

We’ll keep setting the record straight, and we’ll keep reminding some in the media that Americans are very tired of their non-objective reporting.

I couldn’t disagree with her more. If Americans want objective reporting, why do so many of them watch Fox News? On the contrary, a good many Americans want non-objective, biased reporting. They not only want their news to be biased, a good many of them will simply reject anything that doesn’t embrace their particular bias.

I also think Louise Palin is dead wrong about the AP. I think the AP is very serious about getting the facts right. Back when I found a t-shirt at Wal-Mart with a Nazi skull on it, I was interviewed by an AP reporter for an article they published about the controversy. When the article first appeared online, it incorrectly stated that I’m a veteran of the U.S. Navy. I’m not. I’m a veteran of the U.S. Air Force, not that it mattered.

I didn’t really care, because to me, it didn’t make a difference. I didn’t think my military service pertained at all to the article. About 20 minutes after reading the article, the reporter called me. He asked me whether I had said I was in the Navy or the Air Force. I guess he was going over his notes and noticed that I never said I was in the Navy. I told him that I was in the Air Force, but that I don’t think it mattered. He disagreed. He said that the mistake would be fixed immediately. He said the AP cared a lot about getting facts, all the facts, correct.

Sure enough, the AP quickly corrected the article.

I was impressed by this. I didn’t think it really mattered, but they went to the trouble of fixing a mistake anyway.

So when Louise Palin implies that the AP shouldn’t be trusted with the facts, I couldn’t disagree more.

911 terrorists will finally stand trial

TERROR CHIEF PAKISTAN

After eight long years, some of the terrorists involved in the terror attacks of 911 will face a trial in a civilian courtroom.  From the AP (via MSNBC):

Attorney General Eric Holder announced the decision Friday to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to trial at a lower Manhattan courthouse.

I don’t understand why it took this long.  Granted, I didn’t expect Bush to do something like this, but we elected Obama over a year ago, and he was sworn into office in January.

This should have been done his first week in office.

I’ve long believed that we will never defeat terrorism militarily.  Terrorism is a technique, not a nation or a group of people.  How do you wage war against a technique?  The goal should be to hunt down and bring to justice those that engage in this awful, disgusting technique.

Ideally it should be done a lot sooner then eight years after the fact.

For the past eight years, we have fought terrorism by spending billions of dollars in invading and occupying two Muslim countries.  We’ve lost well over 5,000 service members and thousands more have been injured in this futile military pursuit.  It’s hard to say exactly if these costly military excursions and occupations have contributed to the fact that the United States has not suffered a terrorist attack since September 11, 2001, but what is quite clear is that there are more Islamic terrorists in the world today then there was on September 12.

I believe the military occupation of two Muslim countries has greatly contributed to this problem.  I believe that if you want to create more Islamic terrorists, occupy a Muslim country.

I don’t know if we will ever defeat terrorism.  It’s hard to defeat someone who engages in a technique that often results in their own death.  I do know this: terrorism will never be defeated in an epic tank battle.

Responding to terrorism with our massive military makes about as much sense as responding to North Korea invading South Korea by sending the FBI to the Korean Peninsula.  If terrorism will ever be defeated, it will be in the courtroom, not the battlefield. It will be defeated with our laws and our judicial system, not our smart bombs and our main battle tanks.