Hillary Clinton: ‘We’re not talking about an exit strategy or a drop dead deadline’
If your only problem with President Obama’s military escalation of the Afghanistan war was that you thought it included a set date for troop withdrawal, think again. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates taped an interview with David Gregory of NBC’s Meet The Press that seemed to contradict what President Obama said in his speech at West Point. From the interview:
HILLARY CLINTON: We’re not talking about an exit strategy or a drop dead deadline. What we’re talking about is an assessment that in January 2011, we can begin a transition. A transition to hand off — responsibility to the Afghan forces.
ROBERT GATES: We’re not talking about an abrupt withdrawal. We’re talking about something that will take place over a period of time…. Our military thinks we have a real opportunity to do that. And it’s not just in the next 18 months. Because we will have a significant — we will have 100,000 forces — troops there. And they are not leaving– in July of 2011. Some handful or some small number or whatever the conditions permit, we’ll begin to withdraw at that time.
A handful? What a load of crap. And to think that I and every other American was told that a vote of John McCain was in fact a vote for George W. Bush. The idea being is that John McCain would simply continue with the Bush ideas and strategies. Well, the ironic thing is that Defense Secretary Robert Gates used to be George W. Bush’s defense secretary and he is on national TV talking about an open-ended, no deadline set war in Afghanistan.
So how is this any different?
When I voted for Barack Obama, I was looking for some Change. I thought it was time that we stopped spending so much of our money (and future money) on a massive military so that we could have the distinct privilege of waging unwindable wars in far off lands. I thought it was time to instead spend our money and resources closer to home. I thought it was time to start spending our money on things like universal health care and reusable energy.
If Barack Obama wanted to be the war president, he should have said so during the campaign.
Dana Perino: ‘We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term’
I guess former White House Press Secretary Dana Perino has never seen one of those “Never Forget” 911 bumper stickers. Not only was there a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term, it was a fairly large one. In fact, it was the largest terror attack the world has ever seen.
I guess Fox News is trying to pin the blame for the Ft. Hood massacre on President Obama because he doesn’t understand that we are in a war on terror. If we are in fact in a war on terror, why didn’t President Bush have congress declare war on terrorism?
Terrorism is a technique. You can’t wage war against a technique.
I forgot why I stopped watching ‘Meet The Press’
When I heard that MSNBC and Air America radio host Rachel Maddow was going to make an appearance on NBC’s Meet The Press, I decided to make a point to watch it.
I stopped watching Meet The Press shortly after Tim Russert died. It wasn’t because the host died. I just got tired of of how they allowed guests to go on the program and spew lies and half-truths without calling them on it.
I see nothing has changed.
Dick Armey repeated the old lie that MoveOn.org once ran ads that showed President George W. Bush as Adolf Hitler. It of course is not true, and Armey probably knew that. David Gregory, the show’s host, didn’t call Armey on the claim so Maddow had to.
Bush considered sending U.S. troops to Buffalo
Just when I thought the Bush administration couldn’t have been worse, it turns out that it could have been worse. Much worse. According to the New York Times, Bush seriously considered sending U.S. troops into a Buffalo area neighborhood to apprehend the Lackawanna Six.
From the New York Times:
Top Bush administration officials in 2002 debated testing the Constitution by sending American troops into the suburbs of Buffalo to arrest a group of men suspected of plotting with Al Qaeda, according to former administration officials.
Some of the advisers to President George W. Bush, including Vice President Dick Cheney, argued that a president had the power to use the military on domestic soil to sweep up the terrorism suspects, who came to be known as the Lackawanna Six, and declare them enemy combatants.
Mr. Bush ultimately decided against the proposal to use military force.
The absurdity if all this is that there was absolutely no reason to even think of doing this. We dedicate a massive amount of our resources towards having civilian domestic law enforcement. Not only do we have civilian police at the local and state level, we have law enforcement at the federal level such as the FBI. We spend billions of dollars a year to have civilian law enforcement in this country, one of the main reasons is so that we don’t have to have our military going around the country acting as a police force.
I have to wonder, would American troops follow an order to engage in combat on U.S. soil? That’s what it would be, combat. It’s a scary prospect to think that the U.S. military could be used on American soil.
Alberto Gonzales claims he is a casualty of the war on terror
From the Wall Street Journal:
“What is it that I did that is so fundamentally wrong, that deserves this kind of response to my service?” he said during an interview Tuesday, offering his most extensive comments since leaving government.
During a lunch meeting two blocks from the White House, where he served under his longtime friend, President George W. Bush, Mr. Gonzales said that “for some reason, I am portrayed as the one who is evil in formulating policies that people disagree with. I consider myself a casualty, one of the many casualties of the war on terror.”
I wonder, did he wish he hadn’t said that the second after he said it? What a dork. It was only yesterday that I read that a record 151 service members were killed in the line of duty in 2008 in Afghanistan. Those people were truly casualties of the war on terror.
If he can’t find a job, its because he was an awful Attorney General. The man is lucky not to be in prison right now.
That Iraqi shoe guy
Evidently Muntadar al-Zaidi, the reporter that threw his shoes at President George W. Bush, is being looked upon as a hero in Iraq. Thousands of Iraqis are calling for his immediate release from Iraqi custody. His employer, Iraqi-owned TV station al-Baghdadiya, is calling for his release saying he was merely exercising his freedom of expression. By throwing his shoes at someone’s head.
I am so surprised.
If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you probably know that I don’t have much love for George W. Bush. I honestly think he will go down as one of the worst presidents in American history. That doesn’t mean I like the idea of a foreign reporter throwing his shoes at Bush’s head. I think this might be the very first time that I’ve ever felt defensive for George W. Bush and for that I am quite perturbed at Mr. al-Zaidi.
How dare he do something that makes me feel for George W. Bush.
Bush has shoes thrown at him in Iraq
President George W. Bush made a surprise visit to Iraq and he got not one, but two shoes checked at his head for his trouble. He was on stage with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki when an Iraqi reporter, Muntadar al-Zeidi, working for Al-Baghdadia television, an Iraqi-owned station based in Egypt took off his shoes and threw them at Bush.
I’m guessing this is not just another way of being greeted as liberators.
Avoiding the financial apocalypse
I’ll be perfectly honest and admit that there is a lot about the federal financial bailout plan that I just don’t understand. The way I understand it is that unless Congress does everything President Bush and U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson tells them to do, the financial apocalypse (OMG!) will happen and we will end up living in a world that looks and smells very much like the one featured in the Mad Max movies.
Plus, it will be really hard for businesses to get cheap loans.
Secretary Paulson wants the congress to move quickly and to not ask questions. We all know that the congress does a bang-up job when they are told to hurry and not question what is being asked of them. They passed the Patriot Act without bothering to read it and they voted to authorize military force in Iraq without asking a whole lot of questions.
Some of the details emerging about Secretary Paulson’s bailout include the fact that not only will American financial institutions be bailed out, but foreign ones will too. Also, the CEO’s in charge of these failed financial institutions will not be prohibited from receiving lucrative bonuses or payouts for all their hard work running their companies into the ground.
After all, most if not all of them are undoubtedly Republicans.
Why Bush does not play golf
If you’ve been out on the links and haven’t seen George W. Bush whacking the ball, it’s not because you and him always have different tee times. It’s because he has decided to acknowledge the sacrifice made by U.S. service members in Iraq by not playing golf anymore.
From Politico:
“I don’t want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander in chief playing golf,” he said. “I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”Bush said he made that decision after the August 2003 bombing of the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad, which killed Sergio Vieira de Mello, the top U.N. official in Iraq and the organization’s high commissioner for human rights.
“I remember when de Mello, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man’s life,” he said. “I was playing golf — I think I was in central Texas — and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, ‘It’s just not worth it anymore to do.’”
What I find interesting is that he didn’t decide to stop playing golf because of the death of an American service member, but because of the death of a United Nations official. Curious.
I wonder, has he ever thought of acknowledging their sacrifice by stop sending them to Iraq?
I stopped playing golf years ago. Not because I wanted to acknowledge anyone’s sacrifice. I quit because I realized golf really sucks.



Look like President Obama is going to send 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Maybe.
I guess Rush Limbaugh sat down with Sean Hannity and the two talked about how bad things are now that we have a socialist from radical Islamic jungles of Hawaii as our president. Rush reportedly said that he hopes president Obama fails. He also made some kind of weird reference to bending over and being sodomized.


