This week’s second million dollar comic book
It was only a few days ago that a graded copy of Action Comics #1 went for a million dollars. It marked the first time a comic book had sold for one million dollars.
It now has company.
Bleeding Cool is reporting that a graded copy of Detective Comics #27 has now sold for over one million dollars, $1,075,500 to be exact. The comic features the first appearance of Batman.
I’m having a hard time relating to something like this. I once owned a comic book that Wizard magazine was worth $80. It was a mint copy of The New Mutants #87. It featured the first appearance of the time traveling mutant known as Cable. For the life of me, I cannot remember what I did with it. I only know that I no longer have it. Not that it really matters. I remember seeing it at a comic book convention for $20.
I think this just goes to show that even though many Americans are unemployed and people are losing their homes to foreclosure, some people have more money than they know what to do with.
7 things I did not like about ‘The Dark Knight’
I watched The Dark Knight for the second time Friday and I’m still surprised just how popular this movie was. I just don’t get it. Instead of seeing one of the best comic book movies ever made, I see a movie with lots and lots of flaws.
Here is a quick list of the things I didn’t like about The Dark Knight:
- They replaced Gotham City with Chicago. In the first Batman movie, Batman Begins, the story clearly took place in a city that was unlike any other city in North America. It didn’t look like New York, Toronto, Chicago, or Seattle. It looked like the fictitious city of Gotham. In The Dark Knight, it was clearly shot in the city of Chicago. There was the elevated train tracks and the river that runs through the city. The only thing that was missing was a shot of Oprah and Stedman sharing a hot dog watching a ball game at Wrigley field. It didn’t look anything at all like the Gotham in Batman Begins.
- Batman sounded stupid. For some unknown reason, any time Batman was in costume, Christian Bale spoke in a low, guttural mumble. At first I thought it was some retarded way of disguising his voice, but even when Batman was with Lucius Fox (played by Morgan Freeman), he spoke in low mumbles. Christian Bale didn’t speak this way in the first movie.
- The part of Rachel Dawes was played by a different actress. In the first movie, Rachel was played by actress Katie Holmes. In this movie, it was played by Maggie Gyllenhaal. If director Christopher Nolan wanted Gyllenhaal to play the part of Rachel, he should have cast her as Rachel in Batman Begins. Changing actresses between movies is just as stupid as changing actresses halfway through a movie. What’s even worse is that the viewer is supposed to just know that Gyllenhaal is now Rachel. It’s as if Nolan thinks everyone has a subscription to Entertainment Weekly and watches Entertainment Tonight on a nightly basis. It’s lazy story telling.
- The whole cellphone powered sonar technology thing. Honestly, this was one of the dumbest things I’ve ever seen. I wouldn’t be surprised if this concept was pitched by a Make-a-Wish kid and nobody wanted to break the little tike’s heart by saying no.
- Commissioner Gordon faking his own death even to his family. I can understand him not trusting his own fellow police officers because everyone knows that Gotham City police are corrupt, but allowing his wife and children to think he’s dead makes him just as evil as the Joker.
- Snatching the Asian man from the ground with a C-130. I’ve got to admit this was really cool the first time I watched it in the John Wayne movie, The Green Berets. It just seemed too hard to believe that a C-130 would be able to get in and get out of Chinese airspace without facing some kind of response from the Chinese air defense force. The last time I looked, Hong Kong is an island surrounded by lots and lots of water. It would have been far easier just to sneak the guy out on a boat of even a bat-submarine.
- Batman kills Two-Face. To save Commissioner Gordon’s son, Batman pushes Harvey Dent off a building, killing him in the process. This went against almost everything Batman has ever stood for since he was created decades ago. Batman does not kill. If he is going to kill Two-Face, why doesn’t he also kill the Joker?
There were quite a few things I liked about the movie. For instance, Heath Ledger as the Joker was ridiculously good. He was by far the best thing in this movie. If I owned this movie on DVD instead of Blu-ray, I’d be temped to edit a version of the movie that only contained scenes with the Joker.
Holy Bat-Manga controversy!
Bat-Manga! The Secret History of Batman in Japan was published a couple of weeks ago. I noticed the book at Borders. The thing that drew my attention was that it was released in two formats- both hardbound and paperback. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before.
In the late 60’s Shonen King, a weekly Japanese manga anthology for boys, licensed the rights to Batman and Robin. Drawn by Jiro Kuwata, the weekly stories featured Batman and Robin fighting giant robots and mutated dinosaurs.
The stories only appeared for a year. Evidently even DC Comics forgot that Batman and Robin were licensed in Japan. The stories were rediscovered by the book’s authors, Chip Kidd and Saul Ferris.
Bat-Manga! The Secret History of Batman in Japan not only features the original Jiro Kuwata strips translated into English for the first time, it includes an exclusive interview with Jiro Kuwata along with photographs of vintage Japanese Batman toys.
Evidently the book as been met with at least some criticism from some in the comic book blogosphere. The reason? Jiro Kuwata’s name fails to appear on the book’s cover. I guess I could understand the controversy if the book only contained the work of Jiro Kuwata. It doesn’t.
Some of the criticism has been overly brutal.
Chip Kidd has responded to the criticism and has offered an analogy:
But I would put forth the analogy: when Ken Burns made his documentary on the Civil War, the subsequent book had his name, and his writer Geoffrey Ward, on the front. It did not have the names General Ulysses S. Grant, Robert E. Lee, or Abraham Lincoln, or any contemporary historians that Burns interviewed. That may sound like a stretch, but it’s the same situation. We took it upon ourselves to put this project together because of our love for this material. We spent far more of our own money amassing everything then we’ll ever see out of sales of the book; and without going into details, any money we did get as an advance went right back to Mr. Kuwata, who was thrilled to get it. As he is thrilled with the book—I’ve heard nothing but compliments and thanks from him.
Normally I hate analogies because they almost always invariably suck. This one doesn’t. I think it’s right on the mark.
Subscribe


