<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comic book artist Jamal Igle is against copyright infringment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/</link>
	<description>I'm gonna party like it's 2009</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Paul Striber wrote:&lt;blockquote&gt;As far as commisions go i spoke to my buddy again, who works for Warner bros and he said, QUOTE:
We’re not going after freelancers for doing private commissions if they don’t infringe on DC’s trademark. it’s something that doesn’t cost us anything, They’ve been doing it since the industry has been around and If we did it would cause alot of undue tension with the freelance community.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you?  You are clearly lying.  Not only do I not believe a buddy of yours that works for Warner Bros told you that they don't care if artists reproduce their copyrighted protected properties, I do not believe you even have a buddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Striber wrote:<br />
<blockquote>As far as commisions go i spoke to my buddy again, who works for Warner bros and he said, QUOTE:<br />
We’re not going after freelancers for doing private commissions if they don’t infringe on DC’s trademark. it’s something that doesn’t cost us anything, They’ve been doing it since the industry has been around and If we did it would cause alot of undue tension with the freelance community.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you?  You are clearly lying.  Not only do I not believe a buddy of yours that works for Warner Bros told you that they don&#8217;t care if artists reproduce their copyrighted protected properties, I do not believe you even have a buddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Striber</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Striber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>then you didn't see the other links to bible publishers talking about their royalty structures. I'm not surprised though. After reading your various post your  opinions are usually misinformed. For example: Alex Ross is doing Superpowers for Dynamite Entertainment, the characters are public domain characters and just like with Alan Moore's ABC comics you can bet they'll make Royalties off of the trade sales. Obviously you didn't know that.
Ron:
You're saying that corporate comics killed the industry for kids, I make the argument to you,how? they have a lower price point and generally make it possible for smaller publishers to even get their work on the stands. there's no monopoly on the publishing side. there's questionable practices on Diamonds side.
As far as commisions go i spoke to my buddy again, who works for Warner bros and he said, QUOTE:
We're not going after freelancers for doing private commissions if they don't infringe on DC's trademark. it's something that doesn't cost us anything, They've been doing it since the industry has been around and If we did it would cause alot of undue tension with the freelance community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then you didn&#8217;t see the other links to bible publishers talking about their royalty structures. I&#8217;m not surprised though. After reading your various post your  opinions are usually misinformed. For example: Alex Ross is doing Superpowers for Dynamite Entertainment, the characters are public domain characters and just like with Alan Moore&#8217;s ABC comics you can bet they&#8217;ll make Royalties off of the trade sales. Obviously you didn&#8217;t know that.<br />
Ron:<br />
You&#8217;re saying that corporate comics killed the industry for kids, I make the argument to you,how? they have a lower price point and generally make it possible for smaller publishers to even get their work on the stands. there&#8217;s no monopoly on the publishing side. there&#8217;s questionable practices on Diamonds side.<br />
As far as commisions go i spoke to my buddy again, who works for Warner bros and he said, QUOTE:<br />
We&#8217;re not going after freelancers for doing private commissions if they don&#8217;t infringe on DC&#8217;s trademark. it&#8217;s something that doesn&#8217;t cost us anything, They&#8217;ve been doing it since the industry has been around and If we did it would cause alot of undue tension with the freelance community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Rottman</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Rottman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>DJ Sloofus wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m having a hard time following this (argument? discussion?), so I think I’ll just bail out. You guys lost me at the bible talk.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It was something somebody on the Newsarama thread said about Bibles.  Jamal said that when a Bible is sold in a store, the publisher of that Bible receives a royalty payment. That's really the opposite way royalties work.  Publishers don't get paid royalties.  They are the ones paying royalties to whoever owns the rights to what was published.  In this case, the Bible.   The whole point was worthless because the Bible is in the public domain.  I pointed this out and Jamal copied &#038; pasted something about women buying purple Bibles to match their dresses.  Weird.

It was then I decided to bail on the Newsarama discussion because it was pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ Sloofus wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m having a hard time following this (argument? discussion?), so I think I’ll just bail out. You guys lost me at the bible talk.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was something somebody on the Newsarama thread said about Bibles.  Jamal said that when a Bible is sold in a store, the publisher of that Bible receives a royalty payment. That&#8217;s really the opposite way royalties work.  Publishers don&#8217;t get paid royalties.  They are the ones paying royalties to whoever owns the rights to what was published.  In this case, the Bible.   The whole point was worthless because the Bible is in the public domain.  I pointed this out and Jamal copied &#038; pasted something about women buying purple Bibles to match their dresses.  Weird.</p>
<p>It was then I decided to bail on the Newsarama discussion because it was pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonSchooly</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>RonSchooly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>"As far as corporations ruining comics for kids, If you know your comic book history,if it weren’t for those corporations comic books would never have existed in the first place."

That is in no way a defense of those same corporations ruining comic books.

And scroll up, Paul. You started it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As far as corporations ruining comics for kids, If you know your comic book history,if it weren’t for those corporations comic books would never have existed in the first place.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is in no way a defense of those same corporations ruining comic books.</p>
<p>And scroll up, Paul. You started it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloofus</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>sloofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>I'm having a hard time following this (argument? discussion?), so I think I'll just bail out. You guys lost me at the bible talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time following this (argument? discussion?), so I think I&#8217;ll just bail out. You guys lost me at the bible talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Rottman</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Rottman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
So you see Rick ,in his zeal to find someone to hang his anger on picked a guy who out flat says “If they ask me to stop I’ll stop” Doesn’t sound like a hypocrite to me. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don’t have any zeal and I’m not angry.  Frankly I don’t really care what it sounds like to you because you are an idiot.

&lt;blockquote&gt; Oh and I loved where you were proven wrong also about Bible sales and royalties, too. I’m guessing you don’t work in publishing.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Proven wrong?  Did you even bother to read it?  Royalties are never paid for intellectual property that is in the public domain.  This includes The Bible.  Royalties also never go to the publisher as Jamal stated.  Royalties are payments that the publisher pays to the owner of the intellectual property for the right to publish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
So you see Rick ,in his zeal to find someone to hang his anger on picked a guy who out flat says “If they ask me to stop I’ll stop” Doesn’t sound like a hypocrite to me. </p></blockquote>
<p>I don’t have any zeal and I’m not angry.  Frankly I don’t really care what it sounds like to you because you are an idiot.</p>
<blockquote><p> Oh and I loved where you were proven wrong also about Bible sales and royalties, too. I’m guessing you don’t work in publishing.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Proven wrong?  Did you even bother to read it?  Royalties are never paid for intellectual property that is in the public domain.  This includes The Bible.  Royalties also never go to the publisher as Jamal stated.  Royalties are payments that the publisher pays to the owner of the intellectual property for the right to publish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Rottman</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1321</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Rottman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1321</guid>
		<description>Paul Striber wrote: &lt;blockquote&gt;one of the things Rick has left out of his various replies to this post is something Igle himself said on Newsarama.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Left out?  My intention was not to recreate the entire thread over on Newsarama.  I was only commenting on something said by Jamal Igle.  I thought the comment by Jamal that people who BitTorrent comics should be prosecuted was an incredible thing to say considering the fact that he himself breaks copyright laws.

And the part where Jamal says that he will stop infringing on DC Comic’s intellectual property if they ask him is a little ridiculous.  DC Comics has the following posted on their website:

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dccomics.com/about/?action=copyrights" rel="nofollow"&gt;COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK NOTICES&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
Except as noted, all books, titles, characters, character names, slogans, logos, and related indicia are trademarks of and copyright DC Comics and/or WildStorm Productions, an imprint of DC Comics.

Following the above statement is a list of all of the exceptions going to individuals or companies that own at least some of the rights pertaining to various characters.  I took a look at the list and I didn’t see Jamal’s name anywhere.  He appears to not own any rights to the intellectual property he uses when he does commissions.  Not that I ever thought he did.

Jamal Igle saying he will stop doing commissions based on DC properties if they ask him is as ridiculous as Z-Cult FM saying they won’t host trackers of copyrighted comics if the publishers send them a letter.  Since the publishers have already announced that they and they alone own the rights to the characters, they don’t need to tell anyone NOT to use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Striber wrote:<br />
<blockquote>one of the things Rick has left out of his various replies to this post is something Igle himself said on Newsarama.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Left out?  My intention was not to recreate the entire thread over on Newsarama.  I was only commenting on something said by Jamal Igle.  I thought the comment by Jamal that people who BitTorrent comics should be prosecuted was an incredible thing to say considering the fact that he himself breaks copyright laws.</p>
<p>And the part where Jamal says that he will stop infringing on DC Comic’s intellectual property if they ask him is a little ridiculous.  DC Comics has the following posted on their website:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dccomics.com/about/?action=copyrights" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.dccomics.com');" rel="nofollow">COPYRIGHT AND TRADEMARK NOTICES</a></strong><br />
Except as noted, all books, titles, characters, character names, slogans, logos, and related indicia are trademarks of and copyright DC Comics and/or WildStorm Productions, an imprint of DC Comics.</p>
<p>Following the above statement is a list of all of the exceptions going to individuals or companies that own at least some of the rights pertaining to various characters.  I took a look at the list and I didn’t see Jamal’s name anywhere.  He appears to not own any rights to the intellectual property he uses when he does commissions.  Not that I ever thought he did.</p>
<p>Jamal Igle saying he will stop doing commissions based on DC properties if they ask him is as ridiculous as Z-Cult FM saying they won’t host trackers of copyrighted comics if the publishers send them a letter.  Since the publishers have already announced that they and they alone own the rights to the characters, they don’t need to tell anyone NOT to use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Striber</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Striber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>So you see Rick ,in his zeal to find someone to hang his anger on picked a guy who out flat says "If they ask me to stop I'll stop" Doesn't sound like a hypocrite to me.
 So lets see, if we can keep up here shall we:
A) Marvel is sending cease and desist letters to various trackers and Torrent sites because they feel copyright infringement is illegal.
B) Popular artists agrees with them
C)Rick makes a stink about commisions
D)Same artist, more than one, let him know that it's not only legal for them to do it but encouraged by the same companies
D)Oh and I loved where you were proven wrong also about Bible sales and royalties, too. I'm guessing you don't work in publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you see Rick ,in his zeal to find someone to hang his anger on picked a guy who out flat says &#8220;If they ask me to stop I&#8217;ll stop&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t sound like a hypocrite to me.<br />
 So lets see, if we can keep up here shall we:<br />
A) Marvel is sending cease and desist letters to various trackers and Torrent sites because they feel copyright infringement is illegal.<br />
B) Popular artists agrees with them<br />
C)Rick makes a stink about commisions<br />
D)Same artist, more than one, let him know that it&#8217;s not only legal for them to do it but encouraged by the same companies<br />
D)Oh and I loved where you were proven wrong also about Bible sales and royalties, too. I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t work in publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Striber</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Striber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>The last paragraph was actually Igle's reply:
No, because unlike scanning a comic book, it's original material, it's good PR for the companies and the convention organizers because it gets a lot of fans to come to conventions in the first place. The Key difference is that as Colleen has said , is that comic book companies don't have a problem with convention sketches. Now you may say that hypocritical but it's not. It's up to the discretion of the companies. Now, If I were sent a cease and desist from DC that said no more con sketches of their characters, I would respect that. I have more than enough of my own ideas to draw from without doing commissions of their characters. Damn, guaranteed though the moment that happened another company would step up and say"SKetch our characters, we don't care what you do"
__________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last paragraph was actually Igle&#8217;s reply:<br />
No, because unlike scanning a comic book, it&#8217;s original material, it&#8217;s good PR for the companies and the convention organizers because it gets a lot of fans to come to conventions in the first place. The Key difference is that as Colleen has said , is that comic book companies don&#8217;t have a problem with convention sketches. Now you may say that hypocritical but it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s up to the discretion of the companies. Now, If I were sent a cease and desist from DC that said no more con sketches of their characters, I would respect that. I have more than enough of my own ideas to draw from without doing commissions of their characters. Damn, guaranteed though the moment that happened another company would step up and say&#8221;SKetch our characters, we don&#8217;t care what you do&#8221;<br />
__________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Striber</title>
		<link>http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/comment-page-1/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Striber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bentcorner.com/2007/12/06/comic-book-artist-jamal-igle-is-against-copyright-infringment/#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>Ron-
I didn't attack him until he attacked me first and while that's a totally school yard scenario awnser it still remains true.
As far as corporations ruining comics for kids, If you know your comic book history,if it weren't for those corporations comic books would never have existed in the first place.

As much as some people may not like it, Marvel, DC, image and Dark Horse make it possible for small press creators to get their product out there and be seen. Most retailers won't touch an indy book because they can't afford it, the ones who do have to have "corporate" comics in their stores to get people through the door to support  the indy titles that are available.

Sloofus_ And you'd be in the right to prosecute an artist for copyright infringement: one of the things Rick has left out of his various replies to this post is something I gle himself said on Newsarama:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent Corner
Should comic book artists that reproduce copyrighted material for sale at comic book conventions also be prosecuted? Very few of them actually own the rights to the material they are reproducing. Many of them charge customers hundreds of dollars to reproduce artwork that features characters owned by Marvel, DC, etc. Not only do they do commission work of protected material, some even go as far as to sell mass produced prints of the same artwork. The last comic book convention I attended featured many artists selling prints like this.

Unlike the people that break copyright laws by participating in comic book file sharing, many comic book artists are profiting monetarily with their copyright infringement. I have no idea how much money changes hands at comic book conventions for reproduced copyrighted material done by comic book artists, but I would have to assume that the figure is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. That's money the owners of the copyrighted material never see. That's money that could be used to purchase licensed material in the dealer's room.

No, because unlike scanning a comic book, it's original material, it's good PR for the companies and the convention organizers because it gets a lot of fans to come to conventions in the first place. The Key difference is that as Colleen has said , is that comic book companies don't have a problem with convention sketches. Now you may say that hypocritical but it's not. It's up to the discretion of the companies. Now, If I were sent a cease and desist from DC that said no more con sketches of their characters, I would respect that. I have more than enough of my own ideas to draw from without doing commissions of their characters. Damn, guaranteed though the moment that happened another company would step up and say"SKetch our characters, we don't care what you do"
__________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron-<br />
I didn&#8217;t attack him until he attacked me first and while that&#8217;s a totally school yard scenario awnser it still remains true.<br />
As far as corporations ruining comics for kids, If you know your comic book history,if it weren&#8217;t for those corporations comic books would never have existed in the first place.</p>
<p>As much as some people may not like it, Marvel, DC, image and Dark Horse make it possible for small press creators to get their product out there and be seen. Most retailers won&#8217;t touch an indy book because they can&#8217;t afford it, the ones who do have to have &#8220;corporate&#8221; comics in their stores to get people through the door to support  the indy titles that are available.</p>
<p>Sloofus_ And you&#8217;d be in the right to prosecute an artist for copyright infringement: one of the things Rick has left out of his various replies to this post is something I gle himself said on Newsarama:<br />
Quote:<br />
Originally Posted by Bent Corner<br />
Should comic book artists that reproduce copyrighted material for sale at comic book conventions also be prosecuted? Very few of them actually own the rights to the material they are reproducing. Many of them charge customers hundreds of dollars to reproduce artwork that features characters owned by Marvel, DC, etc. Not only do they do commission work of protected material, some even go as far as to sell mass produced prints of the same artwork. The last comic book convention I attended featured many artists selling prints like this.</p>
<p>Unlike the people that break copyright laws by participating in comic book file sharing, many comic book artists are profiting monetarily with their copyright infringement. I have no idea how much money changes hands at comic book conventions for reproduced copyrighted material done by comic book artists, but I would have to assume that the figure is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. That&#8217;s money the owners of the copyrighted material never see. That&#8217;s money that could be used to purchase licensed material in the dealer&#8217;s room.</p>
<p>No, because unlike scanning a comic book, it&#8217;s original material, it&#8217;s good PR for the companies and the convention organizers because it gets a lot of fans to come to conventions in the first place. The Key difference is that as Colleen has said , is that comic book companies don&#8217;t have a problem with convention sketches. Now you may say that hypocritical but it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s up to the discretion of the companies. Now, If I were sent a cease and desist from DC that said no more con sketches of their characters, I would respect that. I have more than enough of my own ideas to draw from without doing commissions of their characters. Damn, guaranteed though the moment that happened another company would step up and say&#8221;SKetch our characters, we don&#8217;t care what you do&#8221;<br />
__________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
