If you conduct an internet poll, you are going to get the opinion of people who use the internet. 

Isn’t it reasonable to assume that the other canidates’ supporters had equal opportunity to organize and "flood" the poll with their own opinions? 

Isn’t this the equivilant of "turning out" your supporters for an ellection?  Isn’t the ability to get your supporters to the polls a traditional guage used to judge campaign strength? 

It would be like going to a Star Trek convention and polling them about which was better- Star Wars or Star Trek. The results would be hopelessly skewed because the sample would be tainted.

I also like how Retro refers to that idiot as "Dr. Paul." Is that to lend him credence? Then I’m Schooly G, Esquire, MD, PhD, DDT, and FU.

Remember how 2000 ended, everybody- the Supreme Court appointed a President because of fuck nuggets like Ron Paul and their brain-dead supporters.

Say, you’re not a social parasite sucking off the public teat, are you?

No, I’m lactate intolerant.

He is, apparently, so accustomed to being sodomized by the powers that be, that he hasen’t even noticed the loss of his Liberty’s and his ability to think freely. Or, perhaps he is just not bright enough to realize he is backing the wrong horse. Ignorant with a stretched out rectum is no way to go through life son.

And you my friend are just the type of Ron Paul follower that will drive away more voters then attract. You might be surprised to learn that its possible to discuss politics without having to discuss sodomy and/or the stretching out of one’s rectum.

I like how you compare Ron Paul to Hitler.

I didn’t compare Ron Paul to Hitler. Go back and actually read what I wrote.

I’ll let them know over at http://www.fredthompsonforum.com that you have the best anti-paul blog on the Internet.

That is a fake Fred Thompson website run by Ron Paul supporters. This is exactly why people don’t take Ron Paul or his candidacy very seriously. Ron Paul is a Libertarian pretending to be a Republican. Ron Paul followers run a Fred Thompson website pretending to be Thompson followers.

Also, keep up the use of bringing up white supremists supporting Ron Paul. We’ve gotten a lot of traction from that in some other sites.

I was simply pointing out a fact. It’s a fact that one of the websites dirrecting members to go and rigg online polls is a white supremist website. If you don’t like the fact that Ron Paul is the canidate of choice with neonazis, take it up with them.

Why is it wrong for someone to post a link in a chat so people can go vote. Why is it that people who admit how popular Ron Paul is on the internet think it is impossible that he win an internet poll ?

It’s not wrong per say, it just doesn’t mean anything. The point of the CNBC poll was to find out what their viewers thought of the debates. What they noticed from incoming traffic that people voting on the poll were being directed the the various Ron Paul websites.

Did any of these people even watch the debates?
Were any of them CNBC viewers?

Because CNBC suspected that the results were being rigged they removed the poll. IMHO, supporters of Ron Paul ought to get used to it.

What is it about Ron Paul that renders some folks incapable of rational thought?

You’d think a reprieve from rampant governmental theft would be a good thing.

Say, you’re not a social parasite sucking off the public teat, are you? What do you think you stand to lose from a Ron Paul presidency?

By the way, the Nazi were National socialists. Ron Paul and his fans are anything but.

Please do some more research. The truth is out there, just not at CNBC.

Look at what happened to Hitler in the end…I admire you for bringing this to our attention.

I’ll let them know over at http://www.fredthompsonforum.com that you have the best anti-paul blog on the Internet.

Also, keep up the use of bringing up white supremists supporting Ron Paul. We’ve gotten a lot of traction from that in some other sites.