Monthly Archive for July, 2007

There is an update to a story I blogged about the other day concerning the Doctor Strange fan that commissioned Michael Golden to do a Doctor Strange sketch. Michael Golden responded to criticism he has been receiving in a fairly snarky fashion over at The Comics Journal forum.

My favorite part is where he admits to forging his art agent’s signature on the United States Postal Customs form. My second favorite part is where he says that Doctor Strange is not blowing Gerry Turnbull a raspberry.

In my opinion, Golden is only making a bad thing worse. He screwed up. He accepted $500 in payment for a commissioned piece of artwork and then took ten months to actually do the artwork.


The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski
Suite 503
Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-4654

Dear Senator Barbara Mikulski:

This concerns the recent email you sent me asking me to shut off my electrical power this past Saturday for one hour. I didn’t see the message until today when I decided to clean out my spam folder. You claimed in your email that by turning off my electricity for one whole hour, I would be fighting global warming.

I have to ask you Senator Mikulski - do you know how hot it is in central Maryland this time of year? Telling someone in Hagerstown to turn off their electricity on a humid 91-degree day is just down right silly. Especially when you realize the air-conditioning will only have to work just that much harder after it is turned back on. You actually conserve more power Senator Mikulski by setting the thermostat to one temperature and leaving it alone.

I couldn’t help but notice you were not in Maryland this past weekend. No, you were on a taxpayer-funded trip to Greenland. It was reported that your trip even included a boat tour of Disko Bay where you witnessed first hand the effects of climate change. You actually got to see ice breaking off glaciers and sliding into the water. That sounds like a nice weekend.

Did they serve snacks on the boat ride?

It’s a shame you couldn’t just do what I normally do when I want to learn about something. Instead of going to Greenland for the weekend to watch big chunks of ice fall into the water, I would just go to Wikipedia and read about it. After reading about climate change over at Wikipedia, I would have then gone over to YouTube and watched videos of the icebergs of Disko Bay. Using the Internet to learn about global warming may not be as exciting as jetting off to Greenland for the weekend, but you have to admit my learn-about-it-on-the-Internet method creates a much smaller carbon footprint then yours.

Using the Internet to learn about things is also much cheaper then your method. Granted, you and I both pay the same amount with our methods - absolutely nothing. Even though you personally didn’t pay for the weekend junket to Greenland, the taxpayers did.

The very same people you told to turn off their air-conditioning on a 91-degree day.

Please do us a favor Senator Mikulski and the next time you decide to take a costly fact-finding trip on the tax-payers dime, stop and ask yourself if you could learn just as much by getting on the Internet.

Democratically Yours,

Rick Rottman

Hagerstown, Maryland

Michael Golden $537 Doctor Strange commissionDoctor Strange fan Gerry Turnbull commissions comic book artist Michael Golden through his art agent Renee Witterstaetter to do a Doctor Strange piece. Instead of the month and a half that was originally promised, it took nine months and Golden even misspelled “virtue”.

Click the image to see a larger version.

I’m assuming that the reference to “Patience is a viru” is referring to the fact that it took nine months for Turnbull to get his artwork. Patience may very well be a virtue, but professionalism is too.

Turnbull contacted Witterstaetter to complain and the art agent claimed she hadn’t seen the artwork even though her signature is on the customs form.

The story has a happy ending. When legendary comic book artist John Byrne learned of this, he instructed Turnbull to email him his mailing address and Byrne would send him something truly worth $500. Kudos to John Byrne.

Link

Friday, July 27, 2007

Chocolate Rain


Once you’ve heard Tay Zonday’s musical masterpiece Chocolate Rain, you cannot get it out of your head. And you don’t want to.

Chocolate Rain MP3 (8.82 MB)

A few weeks ago, I wrote another blog post about the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund. I wanted to calculate the efficiency of what they do with donations. When I was in the Air Force, there was a program called the Combined Federal Campaign. Every year you were “encouraged” to pick a charity out of a booklet so that a portion of your paycheck could be deducted and donated to the charity of your choosing.

There were hundreds of charities listed in the booklet. Along with the name of the charity and a short description of their mission, there was an efficiency rating. I believe it showed how much of the money they received in donations actually went to the very purpose of the charity. It was extremely useful information. I was surprised at how some charities were wasteful with their money.

I wanted to find something similar regarding the CBLDF. I couldn’t find anything. I decided I would try to calculate the numbers myself. I looked at various charity evaluation websites for some guidance. I found formulas that I could use in conjunction with information from the CBLDF’s IRS Form 990’s.

As it turns out, one of the formulas I found and used was in fact wrong. I found it on a charity evaluation website that incorrectly showed how to calculate the fundraising numbers the Better Business Bureau (BBB) recommends. Because of this, the fundraising percentages I posted were in fact too high. I’ve since corrected the formula and the numbers here have been corrected too.

The mistake was not intentional and I apologize for any confusion I may have caused.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Why I do not like cops

Sheri and I were driving to Target before heading over across the Potomic Potomac river and into West Virginia to her brother’s house. Sheri’s nephew was celebrating his fourth birthday and we still had to get him one more gift. He’s into Transformers in a really big way and I remember seeing Transformer helmets with a modulating voice amplifier at Target. Press a button and speak normal and your voice is altered to sound like a Transformer. A pretty cool toy if you ask me.

We were about a mile from Target when I happened to see a Washington County sheriff in my rear view mirror three cars back with his lights blazing. I changed lanes so he could eventually go around me and intercept the evil law breaker he was pursuing. As I changed in the right lane, he did as well. He was then directly behind me and his lights were still flashing. I pulled over and he did too.

I took my driver’s license out and went to the sun visor to get the temporary registration and proof of insurance. I always have that stuff in the sun visor and not in the glove compartment. It’s easier to get to this way. Also, reaching into the glove compartment may cause the cop to think I am going for a weapon.

As the deputy approached the car, I handed him my papers and license before he could even ask for them. He asked me if I knew why he pulled me over. I told him, “No.” He informed me that the expiration date on the temporary tag appears to have washed off.

We purchased a new car, a 2007 Ford Focus, a little over a month ago. We haven’t received the permanent license plates yet. We still have the temporary cardboard tag in place of the rear license plate. The deputy asked me when we purchased the car. That information is located on the temporary registration, but I told him anyway. He then asked me where we purchased the car. Why would he need to know where we purchased the car? What possible reason could he have for knowing this information? I told him we purchased it at Hagerstown Ford.

He then moved over to the front windshield area to look at the VIN number located on the dash. He came back to the window to inform me that the VIN number on the car and the VIN number on the paperwork did not match. Really? You sure about that deputy? I didn’t say anything. If he was convinced the two numbers didn’t match, what could I say that would possibly change his mind? After looking at the two numbers again, he admitted that the VIN numbers indeed matched. Imagine that.

Maybe if he wasn’t wearing those dorky looking wrap around mirrored sunglasses, he could see better.

I know the real reason he was asking stupid questions. He was trying to engage me in conversation. He wanted to see signs that I was under the influence. Never mind it was early afternoon and that I hadn’t so much as had a beer in over two weeks. If he can get me into lengthy conversation, he can claim that my words were slurred. He would then have claim probable cause to have me perform a field sobriety test. Whether I pass or fail the field sobriety test would be solely up to him. The same person that had trouble recognizing that the two VIN numbers were a match.

It’s because of this I try to keep my answers short. One word answers are best. One syllable answers are even better. I speaking to a member of law enforcement, I don’t offer up any information without being asked.

He then told me that he would be right back and he went back to his car. I watched him in my rear view mirror. He was talking on his radio for a while and then proceeded to talk on his cell phone. His cell phone? I got the impression he was making a personal call while we sat in on the side of the road wasting time. Either that or he was calling a fellow deputy to see if they could think of something to write me a ticket for.

After about ten minutes, he got out of his car and returned to my window. He handed everything back to me and told me that I needed to take a marker and write the expiration date back on the temporary tag. He said that he could write me a $60 failure to display proper registration ticket, but he was not going to do that. He thanked me and told me I was free to go.

I didn’t thank him.

I’m not the one that decided Maryland temporary license plates should be made of cardboard and displayed on the back of a vehicle. It rains in Maryland. Cardboard doesn’t react well to water. Making these temporary tags out of simple cardboard and demanding that they be mounted on the rear of the vehicle exposed to the elements is stupid. At the very least they should be mounted on the inside the vehicle on the back window.

Why does it take Maryland so long to issue permanent plates? If they are going to make the temporary tags out of such a flimsy material as cardboard and require them to be mounted to the outside of the vehicle, they ought to be a little quicker with providing the permanent plates.

This is why I don’t like cops. I know that it’s politically incorrect to say something like this, but I’ve never had a good experience with a member of law enforcement. Instead of off fighting crime, this cop wasted time by jacking up someone obviously driving a new car with a water damaged temporary tag. I wasn’t breaking any laws. No one has a reported a stolen black 2007 Ford Focus. He had no legitimate reason for pulling me over and questioning me. He was simply fishing.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Batgirl Showcase outrage

There’s currently a controversy of sorts on the comic book blogosphere concerning the cover of Showcase Presents: Batgirl Volume 1. It’s a collected book of past Batman stories that contain appearances of Batgirl. Showcase books are printed on pulpy paper and are in black and white. This one is over 500 pages in length and priced at $16.99. Not a bad deal if old dopey comic stories are your thing.

The cover in question shows Batgirl fixing her makeup while Batman and Robin kung fu fight the bad guys. The implication it seems is that Batgirl is more worried about her makeup then fighting crime. The cover is based on a splash page from DETECTIVE COMICS #371.

The idea of a superhero, male or female, would be more concerned with his or her appearance then fighting crime seems silly. Then again, superheroes tend to care a great deal about their personal appearance. Otherwise they wouldn’t wear such elaborative and exotic costumes.

Is this cover insulting? On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate this at minus 3.

As a man, I don’t look at this cover and infer from it that men in general enjoy wearing funny costumes and fighting crime with prepubescent boys. Just because Batman is shown this way doesn’t mean all men are this way. Why then do some women look at this cover and insist that it is a disparaging statement about women as a whole?

I thought the Mary Jane statue and the Heroes For Hire cover were things worth complaining about. In fact I complained about them too. This cover is not worth complaining about.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Stop picking on Harry Potter

The current issue of Time Magazine has an essay written by Lev Grossman entitled, Who Dies in Harry Potter? God. It’s an overly pretentious piece that tries to speak to the popularity of the Harry Potter franchise. Instead of celebrating the fact that a book can still be a powerful catalyst of excitement in this age of video games and iPods, Grossman denounces the series because it supposedly lacks the presence of God. He complains that Harry Potter lives in a world free of religion or spirituality of any kind. He complains that in the world crafted by JK Rowlin, young Harry Potter has no one to pray to.

No one to pray to?

I’m getting tired of people picking on Harry Potter. If I didn’t know better, I would think he was not a fictional, made up character, but in fact a real spectacle wearing young boy the neighborhood bully loves to kick around. I’ve never read any of Harry Potter books or watched any of the movies. That doesn’t mean I don’t value what the Harry Potter franchise means to so many people. I also cannot help but notice that seemingly the only people that pretend to have a problem with all things Harry Potter do so because of their religion. Mainly, the Christian religion.

My message to them is this - Harry Potter is not real. The make believe world he and his make believe friends live in is not real. It’s fiction and total make believe. Why anyone would want something as personal and sacred as their religion to be injected into a fictional make believe world is beyond me. I would think Christians would appreciate the fact that JK Rowling did not create a wizard named Jesus that can raise the dead or turn bottled drinking water into fine wine. Let’s not forget how well some Christians respond to books and movies that do make religion a central part of the story. Remember all the Catholic outrage over The Da Vinci Code?

So what if Harry Potter doesn’t pray? If he were to be shown getting down on bended knee and asking God for guidance and then grabbing his magic wand and jumping on his flying broom, religion would be relegated to the make believe world of magic wands and flying broom sticks. God and religion is a very real thing to a great many people. Magic wands and flying broomsticks are not.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said that the nation faces a heightened chance of an attack this summer. Not because he knows of any credible intelligence that points to that. No, because he feels it in his large intestines.

“Summertime seems to be appealing to them,” he said of al-Qaeda. “We do worry that they are rebuilding their activities.”

Still, Chertoff said there are not enough indications of an imminent plot to raise the current threat levels nationwide. And he indicated that his remarks were based on “a gut feeling” formed by past seasonal patterns of terrorist attacks, recent al-Qaeda statements, and intelligence he did not disclose.

Don’t just sit there. Go grab some duct tape and save yourself! It’s summertime and Michael Chertoff’s bowels are talking!

Link

I would encourage anyone that has ever donated money to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund (CBLDF) to look into just how efficient they have been at spending your money. Remember, most of the money they spend every year comes to them in the form of tax-free donations from people like you and me.

Comic book nerds that don’t want our right to read comic books to be trampled upon by those that want to censor what we read.

A good place to start would be the GuideStar website. GuideStar gathers and publicizes information about tax exempt nonprofit organizations such as the CBLDF.

The CBLDF has 501(c)(3) status. That means the CBLDF is recognized by the Federal Government as being organized for the public benefit. Because of this, the CBLDF has been given tax-exempt status. Though they are exempt from actually paying taxes to the IRS, they are required to submit to a Form 990 detailing their finances. From these yearly IRS Form 990’s you can look into just how efficient the CBLDF is at spending the money.

The Better Business Bureau (BBB) has attempted to define a set of standards for charitable organizations. This is from the BBB’s Give.org website:

The BBB Wise Giving Alliance Standards for Charity Accountability were developed to assist donors in making sound giving decisions and to foster public confidence in charitable organizations. The standards seek to encourage fair and honest solicitation practices, to promote ethical conduct by charitable organizations and to advance support of philanthropy.

In measuring effectiveness of finances, the BBB recommends that charitable organizations spend at least 65% of total expenses on program activities. To discover what this amount is, take the amount located on Line 13 of the IRS Form 990 and divide it by the amount located on Line 17 of the same form. The result is the percentage of total expenses spent of program activities.

(Line 13 / Line 17) x 100 = the actual % spent on programing

CBLDF Program Activities

  • 2005 - 52.4%
  • 2004 - 39.7%
  • 2003 - 40.6%
  • 2002 - 53.5%
  • 2001 - 47.3%

By looking at these figures, it appears that the CBLDF has not been very close to achieving this before mentioned 65% benchmark. Not to say that they have a legal requirement to actually spend a certain percentage of their money on what they proclaim to do. In this case, the preservation of First Amendment rights for the comic book community. Evidently unless it’s the First Amendment rights of Gary Groth or comic book publisher Fantagraphics, but I digress.

If the CBLDF isn’t spending the money on defending the First Amendment rights of the comic book community, where is the money going? The BBB suggests that no more than 35% of related contributions be spent on fundraising.

(Line 15 / Line 1a + Line 3) x 100 = the actual % of contributions spent on fundraising


CBLDF Fundraising

  • 2005 - 27.3%
  • 2004 - 32.0%
  • 2003 - 44.9%
  • 2002 - 20.0%
  • 2001 - 17.3%

CBLDF spends a good amount of money on fundraising. By looking at the individual IRS Form 990’s (Line 44 Column D) much of this is due to the costs associated with travel and attending comic book conventions. When I have donated my money to the CBLDF in the past it has been at a comic book convention.

So what does all this mean? Hell if I know. Take from this what you will. Don’t take my word on any of the numbers presented here. Though I have attempted to be totally accurate in the numbers and figures presented, I am no mathematician. I may have screwed up some of the numbers. I don’t think I have, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I have. I would encourage anyone interested in this to go and look at the information for yourself.

It is after all very easily obtainable. I am not telling anyone not to donate to the CBLDF. I am only advising anyone that has donated to the CBLDF in the past or plans to donate to the CBLDF in the future to educate themselves about the CBLDF and what they really do with the money. Don’t rely on the same old CBLDF generated press release republished on all of the various comic book news websites and magazines to give you the entire picture. Those press releases are written to promote donations, not to convey all the facts.

Get the facts.

Update (24 July) - One of the formulas I used was wrong. I didn’t create the formula. I found it on a charity evaluation website that incorrectly showed how to calculate the fundraising numbers the Better Business Bureau (BBB) recommends. Because of this, the fundraising percentages I originally posted were in fact too high. I’ve since corrected the formula and the numbers here have been corrected too.

Next »